Home > Not Working > Webkit-linear-gradient Not Working In Firefox

Webkit-linear-gradient Not Working In Firefox


That is to say, specifying for both mozilla and webkit blew off one or the other. This is different from the latest specification where an angle of 0deg as a direction indicator points to the top. also includes old syntax for the older webkit browsers.. I wouldn't thought of that, beacuse I'm not used to working with svg. have a peek here

And quite often the ‘gracefully degraded' version looks shocking - take the rounded corners, gradient and shadow off a button and all you get is a box. In addition to the unprefixed support using the standard syntax, Gecko 44.0 (Firefox 44.0 / Thunderbird 44.0 / SeaMonkey 2.41) added support for a -webkit prefixed version of the function using I alway searched for and there was no solution in pagespeed. Chris Permalink to comment# March 2, 2010 Jeffrey Way did a great screencast using these not long ago here http://bit.ly/9zFMQR Geldschiene Permalink to comment# April 20, 2011 Thanks for posting that http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15344087/css3-linear-gradient-not-working-properly-on-firefox

Linear Gradient Generator

adds a fallback for old browsers, filter for IE, and vendor prefix for the rest.. Let me tell you a little about myself Are human fetal cells used to produce Pepsi? Order from the publisher (print copy comes with free eBook) or from Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.com, and many more booksellers.

  1. Before being (CSS3) finalised, however, we can expect a further minor change to the specification where directions are specified using an explicit to instead of an implicit from to indicate direction,
  2. And yes, I agree with Jonathan. 🙂 David, You are welcome!
  3. While I think it's cool to stay progressive and try new things, it's somewhat contradictory at the same time.

Basically it boils down to the webkit syntax only supporting percentages in stops, and not supporting pixels for the begin/end (I could do left 1152px, left bottom otherwise) The Firefox syntax I didn't see your last paragraph. It was updated April 1, 2011, July 20, 2011, and again March 3, 2014, each time to clarify and correct browser prefixes and best practices. Css Background Image Sure - we would need to bring all companies together.

If your code works, that's what's most important. Text Gradient Firefox The browser will naturally figure out the actual gradient; you just have to tell it where the "gradual change" should completely "stop". Reply roman: Jul 4/2012 11:34am I like CSS3, unfortunately it's bad supported by browsers. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33898928/linear-gradient-doesnt-work-in-firefox It's subtle but nice…compare to IE or another browser without gradients and you can see the difference.

Regarding the number of HTTP requests, lots and extensive research by, for instance, performance guru Steve Souders (formerly of Yahoo!, now with Google) and by Yahoo!, described in Best Practices for Color Picker They want it to be the same across the board. Rather than tiling a slice of the gradient, the gradient can be repeated to infinity. You can also declare where you want any particular color to "start".

Text Gradient Firefox

Most likely if you are using CSS3 gradients then you are using other css3 features like border-radius, box-shadow, etc. https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-CSS-gradient-not-working-in-Mozilla-Firefox Browser Support / Prefixes So far we've only looked at the new syntax, but CSS gradients have been around for quite a while. Linear Gradient Generator Hassan Permalink to comment# March 2, 2010 Sorry! Linear Gradient Not Working In Chrome A bit more work but it means not loading the image which worth it.

Thank you very much this shared. navigate here I've got it working in all other browsers without issue, but Android. TBH my comments form needs to be properly re-designed, but I’ve added the color into the stylesheet to fix the problem you mentioned. Only had issues in testing on my ancient 2.2 Froyo or whatever snack that release was named after Reply Paul: Jul 1/2011 11:43am Hey, what a great post! Background Clip Firefox

BTW haven't they built another building since you took your photograph of Hong Kong? Unless we have more standards, we have a lot of errors (JavaScript) or at least smashed designs (CSS). And you’ve probably heard also about color gradients in CSS. http://nadrp.com/not-working/webkit-animation-not-working-in-firefox.html Here's the CSS for a rainbow: .element { background: linear-gradient(top, red 0%, orange 15%, yellow 30%, green 45%, blue 60%, indigo 75%, violet 100%); } And here's the result: Browser Support

Mike Permalink to comment# March 2, 2010 Really useful to know and definitely worth implementing now. Bootstrap Looking for a movie of about futuristic city and alien society What is this word problem asking? Can't check right now, but if that's the case, it's not good.

With repeating-linear-gradient(), you don't have to resort to that trickery.

Reply pembe maske says: February 23, 2012 at 11:16 CSS gradients for all web browsers, without using images - Robert's talk Reply Admin Blog says: April 24, 2012 at 9:36 I So the site won't look good in IE8 and prior, FF3.5 and prior,Opera 9 and prior,etc. Here's the site: http://www.bronzetouchwf.com/ Compare a short page to a long one or use control+mousewheel (works in Chrome on Windows) to zoom out (Document > Zoom to fix that). Normally, that tool is good for a solid background that's sem-transparent, but you can also take the semi-transparent colors and plug them into an IE filter gradient.

Thanks for your sharing! Furthermore, and I haven't tested this yet, would using a conditional comment to target IE with its filter utilizing the !important override force the Trident engine to use the gradient instead Reply Should designers learn coding?- Extend Studio Blog says: October 19, 2010 at 14:58 […] about CSS on the internet which you can learn from. this contact form Reply Sumair: Apr 21/2011 1:01am why vendor specific properties its so hard to remember all of them when css3 going to finalize?

Bah! Or even, a browser might prioritize its requests differently and load the bigger images last. The possible values there are: closest-corner, closest-side, farthest-corner, farthest-side. We've used this technique for the background in our sample code boxes and here you can see it slightly more exagerrated: background: -webkit-repeating-linear-gradient(-90deg, rgba(0,0,0,0) 0, rgba(0,0,0,0) 1.4em, rgba(66,208,255,0.5) 1.5em); background: -moz-repeating-linear-gradient(-90deg,

The order of the top/bottom and left/right keywords was also recognized as unimportant, so Mozilla removed the constraint of having top/bottom defined first.  But the new syntax had still had one Fallback wise, I'm sticking to solid color however. This is, as far as I can tell, impossible in the webkit syntax. By default, the gradient will stretch to fill the element it is defined on.